Bandwidth Exceeded -- all better now (obviously)

[Speed Racer]

Web hosting company was nice enough to raise our bandwidth limit again....

The bandwidth limit has been raised. There is no additional charge. Merry Christmas,
and a Happy New Year ; )

yay!

[wallcrawlr]

thank you.

[trdmkii]

see, told you that you were the man, right after you signed off aim, it was back up...quite hilarious i think......YOU ROCK!!!!!!

[rabidchimp.com]

Right on, Steve. Keep those hos inline.
-Aaron

[rsdeo]

No man...I'll just turn your website into THIS again: www.rabidchimp.com/temp

That'll make me happy

Tastefuly done.

Okay where do we and to who do we contribute to in order to raise the bandwidth? I will always help out a good cause.

[dogstar]

No man...I'll just turn your website into THIS again: www.rabidchimp.com/temp

That'll make me happy

Tastefuly done.

Okay where do we and to who do we contribute to in order to raise the bandwidth? I will always help out a good cause.

i agree, on both counts
if there needs to be contributions, do let us know... if our bandwidth is constantly being used up, id be willing to toss a few bucks into the hat to help out.

[kjurkic]

I would think that since bandwidth is a measure of traffic, essentially the transfer of 1's & 0's, that the fewer sent, the better. Each time you visit a page, all that info must be sent, and the biggest data pigs are all those images that peeps and post ho's paste all over the place.

Ergo, fewer pig pics, less 1' & 0's per visit, and less bandwidth wasted.....

Just a thought

Ken

[Speed Racer]

I would think that since bandwidth is a measure of traffic, essentially the transfer of 1's & 0's, that the fewer sent, the better. Each time you visit a page, all that info must be sent, and the biggest data pigs are all those images that peeps and post ho's paste all over the place.

Ergo, fewer pig pics, less 1' & 0's per visit, and less bandwidth wasted.....

Just a thought

Ken

Ken,

Images linked to from servers outside www.celicasupra.com don't actually have any adverse effects on "our" bandwidth since the images are being pulled, thus using someone else's bandwidth. The only image files that are allowed for uploading & posting on CS.com forum are avatars --and they have a 17k limit.

I configured the forum that way on purpose.

Stephen

[zank]

yea man all these new post hos running around Karaki, Puppystar, Suprafiend and Uncle Eng :lol: :wink: its no wonder why it went down

[rsdeo]

I would think that since bandwidth is a measure of traffic, essentially the transfer of 1's & 0's, that the fewer sent, the better. Each time you visit a page, all that info must be sent, and the biggest data pigs are all those images that peeps and post ho's paste all over the place.

Ergo, fewer pig pics, less 1' & 0's per visit, and less bandwidth wasted.....

Just a thought

Ken

Sometimes a little research would be prudent before making ridiculous suggestions. I wouldn't have commented, but is that not an avatar you are using?