I drove a V6 Duratec to Idaho and back to pick up some frineds from college in the late 90's, I was actually impressed with just how much umph that car really had. It had surprising power under the curve; while the numbers are not impressive by modern "standards" I would rate the V6 Duratec as just as good as any modern car, and in many cases actually more enjoyable to drive.
Now I am curious about the service weight on that SHO V8; is the block alloy? Are he heads alloy??
Something of note, power under the curve is something that people forget about; its something that cars of the 90's actually did very well. With the "numbers" wars where auto makers try ever harder to boast more impressive numbers than the next guy or the previous year, they push further and further from engines that are enjoyable to drive. Sure the new stuff makes a crapload of power, but the problem I have seen is these new cars don't really have any more in the RPM range where you actually drive.
This brings me back to the cars of the 90's, where they were producing decent power figures, but at the same time providing you with power where you really use it.
Now I am curious about the service weight on that SHO V8; is the block alloy? Are he heads alloy??
Something of note, power under the curve is something that people forget about; its something that cars of the 90's actually did very well. With the "numbers" wars where auto makers try ever harder to boast more impressive numbers than the next guy or the previous year, they push further and further from engines that are enjoyable to drive. Sure the new stuff makes a crapload of power, but the problem I have seen is these new cars don't really have any more in the RPM range where you actually drive.
This brings me back to the cars of the 90's, where they were producing decent power figures, but at the same time providing you with power where you really use it.