Joined
·
1,493 Posts
5M vs 6M
I think Aaron (SilverMk2) and SupraBob have the right idea on the 6M...
See http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Pit/9975/dataBySubject/GasolineEngines.html
and
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Pit/9975/enginepix/powercurves/6M-GEU.gif
for a very nice comparison of the two motors.
The 6M was rated at 190 HP, 192 lb ft of torque, in the Japan domestic market. No cat, no emissions equipment.
The 5M (83-86) was rated at 175 HP, 177 lb ft of torque in Japan domestic
market. No cat, no emissions equipment.
So, the 6M only had a gain of 15 HP and 15 lb ft of torque vs the 5M.
I believe that the Japan spec ECU's had more aggressive timing and fuel maps as Bob says. I've been told it is due to the fact that they had higher octane gas in Japan, and their owners manuals specified running hi-octane only.
Locally, Rob's German spec (same ECU and tuning as Jap spec) Mk2 ran a 15.9 all stock. Stock intake, puny stock exhaust, etc, even 3.73 rear gears!! I've never seen any other totally stock Mk2 run less than 16 sec in the quarter.
Mark's 6M 82 runs 0.8 sec faster in the quarter than my 83 with 5M. Our cars have similar mods, cool air intake, 2.25 exhaust, advanced timing. He has a header, I don't. According to a HP vs time vs speed spreadsheet that I have, that means he has 25 HP more than me.... 15 HP from the 6M, and 10 HP from the header. It seems to make sense to me.
I think Aaron (SilverMk2) and SupraBob have the right idea on the 6M...
See http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Pit/9975/dataBySubject/GasolineEngines.html
and
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Pit/9975/enginepix/powercurves/6M-GEU.gif
for a very nice comparison of the two motors.
The 6M was rated at 190 HP, 192 lb ft of torque, in the Japan domestic market. No cat, no emissions equipment.
The 5M (83-86) was rated at 175 HP, 177 lb ft of torque in Japan domestic
market. No cat, no emissions equipment.
So, the 6M only had a gain of 15 HP and 15 lb ft of torque vs the 5M.
I believe that the Japan spec ECU's had more aggressive timing and fuel maps as Bob says. I've been told it is due to the fact that they had higher octane gas in Japan, and their owners manuals specified running hi-octane only.
Locally, Rob's German spec (same ECU and tuning as Jap spec) Mk2 ran a 15.9 all stock. Stock intake, puny stock exhaust, etc, even 3.73 rear gears!! I've never seen any other totally stock Mk2 run less than 16 sec in the quarter.
Mark's 6M 82 runs 0.8 sec faster in the quarter than my 83 with 5M. Our cars have similar mods, cool air intake, 2.25 exhaust, advanced timing. He has a header, I don't. According to a HP vs time vs speed spreadsheet that I have, that means he has 25 HP more than me.... 15 HP from the 6M, and 10 HP from the header. It seems to make sense to me.